Macau will keep 6 casino concessions with 10 years terms

Nice find Taxx

The 13 years was a pleasant surprised to me.
I thought it would be shorter like 5.

I’m not surprised about the 6 license

January 14, 2022 - 5:36 AM EST

Macau keeps casino licences limited to six, halves duration
By Farah Master
www.reuters.com/business/macau-limits-new-casino-licences-6-last-up-10-years-2022-01-14/#:~:text=HONG%20KONG%2C%20Jan%2014%20(Reuters,the%20government%20said%20on%20Friday.

Summary

Current six licences expire in June

No detail on when rebidding to take place

Amendments include increase in amount of capital held

HONG KONG, Jan 14 (Reuters) - The number of new casino operators allowed to operate in Macau, the world's largest gambling hub, will continue to be limited to six concessionaires but their operating period will be halved to 10 years, the government said on Friday.

The announcement, which has been long awaited by casino executives, investors and analysts, puts an end to concerns that the government would change the status quo for the number of operators in the Chinese controlled territory.

The former Portuguese colony is the world's biggest gambling hub in terms of money wagered.

It massively tightened scrutiny of casinos in recent years, with authorities clamping down on illicit capital flows from mainland China and targeting underground lending and illegal cash transfers.

A casino executive familiar with the legislation said the government decided not to proceed with the proposal for a government official to directly supervise the casinos after feedback from the operators.

The licences of the six operators, Wynn Macau (1128.HK), Sands China (1928.HK), MGM China (2282.HK), SJM Holdings (0880.HK), Galaxy Entertainment (0880.HK) and Melco Resorts , are all due to expire in June this year.

The government said all existing or potential operators need to apply through a new tender process. It did not detail when operators will have to bid or whether the current licence term will be extended, according to a notice posted on its website.

Casino operators must increase the amount of capital to 5 billion patacas ($623.67 million) from 200 million patacas and increase the requirement for a Macau based director of the company to hold 15% from 10%.

Macau's casino stocks lost billions in market value last September ahead of a 45-day public gaming consultation to gage public consensus over new licences.

The consultation focused on nine areas including the number of licences, employee welfare, as well as introducing government representatives to supervise day to day operations at the casinos.

Beijing, increasingly wary of Macau's acute reliance on gambling, has not yet indicated how the licence rebidding process will be judged. To appeal to authorities, operators have tried to bolster their corporate responsibility and diversify into non-gaming offerings.

($1 = 8.0170 patacas)

I would guess 'costs' associated with getting the use of a casino license in Macau is going up even though this article says 'taxes' will not be going up. Shared prosperity 'giving' will go up. Investment costs in Hengqin will go up. Purchase price of the next 10 year license will go up... to name a few costs going up. And what will the 'levies' be?

And now this...

Macau to have 6 casino licences, lasting 10 years: govt bill

Jan 14, 2022 Newsdesk
www.ggrasia.com/macau-to-have-6-casino-licences-lasting-10-years-govt-bill/

The Macau authorities announced on Friday some of the key aspects of a bill proposing a new regulatory system for gaming that will shape how the industry looks for years ahead.

Macau’s Executive Council, an advisory body to the city’s Chief Executive, stated that there would be a maximum of six concessions, under the government-backed bill. It would end the existing sub-concession model.

It added that the concession period would be a maximum of 10 years, but it could be extended by a further 3 years under exceptional circumstances. The existing six concessions – due to expire in June – covered a 20-year lifespan.

(Read the full press release from the Executive Council: Chinese version and Portuguese version).

Three of the current six operators – namely Sands China Ltd, MGM China Holdings Ltd, and Melco Resorts and Entertainment Ltd – were allowed into the market via a piece of legal improvisation. They actually hold their gaming rights via sub-concessions spun off from the three original concessionaires selected via a 2002 public tender. The three original concessions were the locally-incorporated units of Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd, SJM Holdings Ltd and Wynn Macau Ltd.

The freshly-announced bill is to be sent to the city’s Legislative Assembly, to be voted on by its members. The length of time that procedure will take depends on the city’s legislators, who can also propose changes to the bill.

During Friday’s press conference (pictured), the Executive Council spokesperson, André Cheong Weng Chon (pictured centre), admitted the Legislative Assembly could take some time reviewing the bill. He said the Macau government would consider extending the duration of the existing concessions in order to provide lawmakers with enough time to complete the review process.

More details on the matter would be disclosed at a later stage, said Mr Cheong, who is also Macau’s Secretary for Administration and Justice.

The government has said previously Macau’s gaming law needs to be updated as a linked issue to a fresh public tender process for Macau gaming rights.

The bill also states that the firm actually holding the casino concession would only be allowed to have up to 30 percent of its shares listed publicly. That was in order to ensure a “more stable relationship” between the concessionaire and Macau, stated a press release from the Executive Council.

None of the current Macau casino firms listed either in Hong Kong or the United States, directly owns its respective Macau licence. That is done via an affiliate.

The Macau government had previously suggested a need to approve dividend distribution to shareholders by the city’s casino operators. The proposal was included in a government document regarding the revision of the city’s gaming law, published in September for public consultation. There was no reference to such proposal in Friday’s press conference.

No changes to taxes

Mr Cheong additionally stated there were no plans for tax hikes regarding the gaming industry. Macau taxes the gross gaming revenue of Macau casinos at a rate of 35 percent, but other levies on casino gaming gross raise the tax rate to 39 percent in effect.

According to the summary of the bill, the Macau government has dropped a proposal to appoint “delegates” to Macau’s gaming concessions, that would have monitored the operation of the gaming firms. Instead, the local authorities would strengthen other channels of supervision, said Mr Cheong.

A delegate system is already used in Macau to monitor other forms of public concession. But the idea of applying the system to the gaming sector had attracted a lot of comment during last year’s public consultation.

Macau’s existing gaming law requires that at least “10 percent” of the gaming concession entity’s share capital has to be held by a “managing director” who is a Macau permanent resident. The bill now presented suggests upping that shareholding portion to 15 percent.

The government-backed bill all states that, among the main goals of casino concessionaires, are promotion of national security, as well as Macau’s economic diversification, and the city’s sustainable development.

Asked by a reporter, Mr Cheong did not clarify whether the reference to national security meant Chinese-backed firms would be favoured in a future tender for fresh casino concessions. He said all firms meeting the relevant criteria to be set by the government for the new tender, would be welcome to present a proposal.

Other government suggestions featured in the bill, include the need to increase the minimum share capital requirement for any local casino concessionaire to MOP5 billion (US$625 million) from the existing MOP200-million threshold.

A number of commentators had said prior to Friday, that the likelihood of a prompt announcement on the future of the industry had increased due to the release before Christmas of the summary results from the public consultation held in the autumn.

Let's get real here -- there is NO NEW NEWS.

Obviously the number of concessionaires was not going to change.
Too late to add any for terms that start mid-2022.
And there was no way the number would shrink.
So the six concession standard ... same old same old.

With no new investment needed to be paid out, the term selected makes sense, too.

But we hear only crickets when the tender process and timing and etc. is concerned.

It is still very likely that one of the current concessionaires will get bumped in the tender process.
My vote remains with WYNN, the bad boy who did little for Macau other than churn the VIP trade.

LPL

Any views on what happens next? The lawsuit in Macau gets settled/dismissed or the announcement of the closing of the LV properties to VICI? BTW, Howard Klein doubled down on his $67 PT earlier this week when this thing was headed back to low 30's...

Not sure if WYNN is allowed to sell their Macau license, if they can sell it, the license is probbaly valuable since there are many eager to get into the Macau casino business.

tum....... I agree totally yet Goldstein is very positive on Macau and that indicates to us what under performing management LVS has.